There have been numerous explanations churned out of Washington in support
of the Saud family. Some of these statements are illogical, others disinformation,
while still others are based on erroneous facts. We will deal with some
of these incongruous actions within this newsletter. We see Arabs blaming
the "Americans". The US and Arab citizenry under the control of
the Saud family are both being abused. Again, the net winners in having
the US military protect the Saud family regime are the Saud family and their
chosen lobbyists, lawyers, public relations firms, consultants, spin doctors
and special interests in Washington. The net losers are the Arabs suffering
under the control of the Saud family, US troops sent into the danger zone
to protect them, the families of US servicemen killed in bombings, US citizens
enslaved and tortured by the Saud family and the US citizenry at large.
On June 25 an explosion took place at al Khobar Towers where US military
personnel are housed. Nineteen US servicemen were killed and dozens more
were injured. But, as we know, this was not the first bombing to target
the US military in Saudi Arabia. The November 13, 1995 explosion killed
five Americans. The Saud family authorities arrested and executed the alleged
perpetrators of the November 13 bombing. Yet, US authorities were not allowed
access to the suspects. Such access might have uncovered information which
could have helped to prevent the second bombing and any future actions.
Information about accomplices, future plans for attack, etc would have been
quite useful to US authorities. Additionally, Saud family officials refused
to allow the US military to take prudent safety precautions for US personnel
at al Khobar. Although a policy of damage control by the US State Department
is attempting to downplay the importance of these requests, we cannot help
but imagine that a perimeter fence 400 feet from the complex, as the US
military requested, rather than the 35 yards allowed by the Saud family
would have saved American lives. The Saud family continues to ignore repeated
Washington requests for concurrence. New York Times says: "Despite
Saudi promises of cooperation American officials have been frustrated by
the unwillingness of Saudi Arabia to allow agents of the Federal Bureau
of Investigation free rein, including the right to interview Saudis who
live near the apartments in Dhahran. The director of the F.B.I., Louis Freeh,
has twice traveled to Saudi Arabia to insist on cooperation."D31
Saud family routinely pick the weak and defenseless to enslave and torture. They also draw upon these same people to show their resolve to convict "perpetrators" of crimes against their rule. The four Arabs convicted of blowing up US military personnel were never interviewed by independent parties let alone the US military. One cannot be certain of their guilt given the Saud family penchant of getting random confessions at all costs. The Saud family have had plenty of practice in the art of torture, especially on US citizens. They frequently elicit public confessions from those tortured. Many US citizens have had to sign releases or confessions to various fictitious crimes after being tortured. We have been told by human rights groups that most would sign anything upon being tortured, be they guilty or innocent. In a recent case the Saud family government judiciary beheaded a gay man for raping and murdering two women. It is said he was physically incapable of committing the rapes. He was allegedly in bed with his boyfriend at the time of the criminal acts. A sexual deviant with Saud family connections is said to have been the perpetrator of the crime but was never even interrogated.
President Clinton in the Washington Post reports: "Anyone who attacks
one American attacks every American, and we protect and defend our own."D32
This statement is rife with hypocrisy. The President has ordered US troops
into an area which is high risk, ostensibly to protect US oil vital interests.
One cannot say that when a soldier dies in this danger zone there is enough
pretext to stay and wait for the next US soldier to die, ad infinitum. The
Washington Post further reports: "When President Clinton said that
the attack 'underscores the struggle of all those who share tolerance and
freedom and security,' it was hard to see how more than one of those values
applied to the Saudi regime."D33 This Clinton statement speaks for
itself. We have shown just brief episodes of the enslavement and torture
of vulnerable US citizens in general and Vietnam Veterans in particular
by the Saud family. It seems we are dealing with "the bigger lie theory".
In future issues we will deal with realities and truths of the matter to
combat the disinformation put forth by the Saud family Washington retainers.
The Saud family had better watch out because if history proves right
Washington will think nothing of abandoning them. Washington has abandoned
others for far less than what is happening within the Saud family at present
time. Perhaps even now there are contingency scenarios being planned by
Washington to "leave with honor" the Arabian Peninsula. If there
is anything consistent about Washington it is its willingness to pay lip
service to those who rely upon its military commitment only to be abandoned
when the going gets rough. The Montinyards and loyal South Vietnam troops
were all abandoned by Washington when the going got difficult during the
Vietnam War. We have recently found that Washington trained loyal South
Vietnamese secret forces for such operations as Phoenix. These forces were
abandoned by Washington and were systematically hunted down and executed
after Washington deserted them. It has recently been disclosed Washington
trained super loyal South Vietnamese to make incursions into North Vietnam.
We have since found that Washington wrote these brave soldiers off even
before their perilous assignments. Furthermore, the State Department yet
again has refuse to acknowledge the meager benefits pleaded for by these
valorous soldiers and their families. During the 1970's the Shah of Iran
was abandoned by the Carter Administration with many Iranians loyal to Washington
executed by the Ayatollah Khomeini government. In 1983 the Reagan Administration
sent Marines to support the Lebanese government. Richard W. Murphy in the
New York Times reports; "we lost 241 servicemen in Beirut, President
Ronald Reagan withdrew the largely symbolic force after having earlier cited
its presence as defending a 'vital U.S. national interest.' "D34 It
should be of no comfort to the Saud family to see yet again the Clinton
Administration espousing "vital interests" when talking of the
Saud family government. Murphy, in the New York Times continues; "the
two terrorist incidents in Saudi Arabia have claimed more than the number
of our soldiers who died in Somalia in attacks that brought our speedy retreat
from that country."D35 Is it any wonder that members of the Saud family
hierarchy resort to sizable covert payments to Washington insiders in order
to insure they are warned beforehand of a Washington abandonment so they
can escape in their waiting personal jets. Washington has to either abandon
the corrupt Saud family in the near future or commit many more US troops
to support the regime. It is our objective to see that if and when the Saud
family are abandoned by Washington they are refused asylum within the US
as systematic torturers of US citizens. We would like to have each and every
Saud family member investigated for crimes against humanity. We will also
work towards repatriating the monies the Saud family have stolen from the
Arabian Peninsula Arabs.
Washington has finally admitted what we long have suspected. Jack Anderson
and Jan Moller in the Washington Post report: "After five years of
denying any American soldiers were exposed to chemical weapons in the gulf,
the Pentagon suddenly called a news conference late Friday afternoon to
announce 'new' information about possible chemical exposure. ... Before
Friday's announcement, the Pentagon had denied any and all reports that
American soldiers could have been exposed to chemical weapons in the gulf.
Even in the wake of last week's revelation, Defense Department officials
still say there is 'no clinical evidence that U.S. troops were exposed to
chemical weapons.' "D36 Desert Storm Syndrome Poisoning victims are
suffering the same consequences as Agent Orange victims forsaken by Washington.
We find it hard to believe that Washington consistently abandons US military
and loyal friends when they loose there influence and are no longer needed.
"If I can do this to Americans I can do it to you.
What chance do you think you have? I have power. I have connections."
King Fahd's prior business partner publicly torturing Vietnam Veterans in
front of other foreign workers.
P.O. 3762
Arlington VA 22203
(703) 979-4236